Monthly Archives: February 2012

Signs of recall sentiment in Germantown

Proudly displayed by a homeowner on a bucolic residental street in Germantown, Wisconsin.

A large banner supporting the imminent recall of Scott Walker from the post of Governor of Wisconsin deserves some mention, when it appears in Germantown, the south-east corner of Ozaukee County, north of Menominee Falls and just diagonal from the northwest corner of Milwaukee County.

The largest bloc of Republican votes in recent elections came from counties that surround Milwaukee like a siege ring. Without them, the reliable Republican vote spread thinly through the rest of the state would be a feeble challenge.

Of course this is the United States of America, so there is no constituency where any candidate or party can count on 90 percent, or 99 percent, and seldom even 70 or 80 percent. In a presidential election, 60 percent is called a “landslide,” even though it means 40 percent of the voters wanted another candidate; even 55 percent is considered a strong showing.

Scott Walker was elected governor with 52 percent of the votes in 2010, that is, 52 percent of 49 percent of eligible voters. In Ozaukee and Washington counties, 66 and 60 percent of eligible voters turned out, among the top three counties in the state, giving Walker 68.9 and 75.2 percent of the votes cast.

If Walker’s support in these bastions of loyal support drops by five percent or so, without his support drastically improving somewhere else in the state, his effort to retain office is in serious trouble. A recall election is not about the losers getting a second bite at the apple. If recall petitions were mostly or only signed by people who voted for a different candidate in the general election, a recall would simply result in roughly the same result. A recall is about people who did vote for the incumbent, expressing shock and revulsion over his (or her) performance in office. It may also, secondarily, be about people who weren’t inspired to vote for anyone. This last group, if motivated by the incumbent’s performance to get out of their comfy couches and go vote in the recall, could swing the result as well.

Democratic Party fundraising appeals are highlighting Scott Walker’s highly successful out of state fundraising. The names of Texas millionaire Bob Perry, and of course the Koch brothers, are a natural foil. Reportedly, these villains from central casting have pledged that they are “going all in to save Scott Walker.” No doubt they are, and they have the money to pour into it.

But this time around, they really don’t matter. When voters don’t know the candidates well, millions of dollars buying a non-stop stream of TV spots can swing an election. You can fool all of the people some of the time. A lie repeated often enough will be believed, at least for a while, just as Joseph Goebbels said. But the recall is not about doubt, confusion, and uncertainty. Most voters in Wisconsin made up their minds in February 2011. Everyone in Wisconsin has seen Scott Walker on display, and either approves or does not. No amount of television advertising is going to sway opinion this time around. It’s just a show, with both sides preaching to the choir.

Walker still has support – nobody should make a mistake about that. He’s not going to be turned out of office by a 90 percent majority, or even 70 percent. He is likely to win 45 percent of the votes, quite possibly even 47 or 48 percent. But that falls short of a majority. There are “I Stand With Walker” signs in various parts of Germantown, Waukesha, and along the lonely stretch of Highway 20 west of East Troy. But there are “Recall Walker” signs in Waukesha, in Germantown, in Whitewater, Watertown, and Fort Atkinson.

A governor who does a decent job usually gets an approval rating above the percentage of people who actually voted for him. Walker’s approval rating plunged sharply below his 52 percent majority in his first couple of months in office. If his support slips even five percent in the recall, he’ll be looking for a new job. This one will be decided by the well-informed citizens of Wisconsin, not by out-of-state money.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Crimes may be added to lies as reasons for recall

The primary motivation for a campaign to recall Scott Walker from the governor’s office was that a significant portion of those who voted for him in the first place felt betrayed by his actual conduct in office. But according to information being gleefully emailed around the state from Democratic Party of Wisconsin email addresses, his administration may, in little over a year, have racked up a record of criminal corruption as well. Fifteen felony charges and three misdemeanor complaints have been filed against six of Walker’s closest associates.

One criminal complaint filed by prosecutors, according to Maggie Brickerman, the party’s state executive director, charges a secret email network set up twenty-five feet from the official governor’s office, as an end-run around open records laws, used among other things to do political campaigning and fundraising on taxpayer’s time. It wouldn’t be the first time; legislative leaders of both parties have been tried and convicted of similar misdeeds. But, for a governor subject to recall by the voters who elected him, to be doing this so flagrantly at the top of the executive branch, would take such venal corruption to a new level.

Kelly Rindfleisch, former Deputy Chief of Staff, and Darlene Wink, former Director of Constituent Services, have been charged with campaign finance violations, sending out campaign emails and organizing fundraisers while on the clock as state employees, time paid for by taxpayers to conduct public business. Tim Russell, former Deputy Chief of Staff, has been arrested on charges of stealing thousands of dollars intended for wounded veterans and families of military service members who died in Iraq and Afghanistan. Kevin Kavanaugh, a Walker appointee to the Veteran Service Commission, has been charged with five felonies, all revolving around theft of funds from the Military Order of the Purple Heart and Operation Freedom.

It can hardly be said that the arrest of Brian Pierick, former operator of, for felony enticement of a child, is related to either the Walker campaign or the conduct of state business. But the other arrests — albeit each individual is entitled to a presumption of innocence until proven guilty in court — outline a possibility that the Walker administration views the state as an oyster bed to be tapped, rather than regarding state business as an opportunity for public service.

When he took office, Walker began concentrating unprecedented power into his own hands as governor, eliminating the independence from day to day politics of such agencies as the Department of Natural Resources. Money and power… power and money… Walker may have ambitions to wield the power assembled by the late Huey P. Long in Louisiana, although without any pretense to Sharing the Wealth. Replacing him in the upcoming recall election might well nip a nascent bid for dictatorship in the bud.

Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at